[pgpool-hackers: 4368] Re: NAMEDATALEN 128

[Igor Yurchenko]

 Ah, yeah, really... It sounds much better.
BR
Igor Yurchenko


On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 13:37, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp> wrote:

> > Hi
> > Great! Thanks!
> > It may be a point in addition to pull the parameter up to the options of
> > ./configure with a default value 64.
>
> I am not sure it's a good idea. If pgpool does that and PostgreSQL's
> NAMEDATALEN remains the default, the result will be a disaster.  While
> building pgpool, I think pgpool should look into PostgreSQL's
> pg_config_manual.h where NAMEDATALEN resides, rathter copying the
> file. This way, pgpool could sync with PostgreSQL's NAMEDATALEN.
>
> Best reagards,
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS LLC
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pgpool.net/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/attachments/20230814/c4961002/attachment.htm>