[pgpool-hackers: 3915] ERROR: failed to process PCP request at the moment
Tatsuo Ishii
ishii at sraoss.co.jp
Sun Jun 6 15:13:50 JST 2021
I created 4-node cluster using pgpool_setup then detached node 0 using pcp_detach_node:
$ pgpool_setup -n 4
$ ./startall
$ pcp_detatch_node -p 11001 0
This resulted in node 3 is left in down status which is not an
expected result. I found following in the pgpool.log:
2021-06-05 07:22:17: follow_child pid 6593: LOG: execute command: /home/t-ishii/work/Pgpool-II/current/x/etc/follow_primary.sh 3 /tmp 11005 /home/t-ishii/work/Pgpool-II/current/x/data3 1 0 /tmp 0 11002 /home/t-ishii/work/Pgpool-II/current/x/data0
2021-06-05 07:22:17: pcp_main pid 6848: LOG: forked new pcp worker, pid=7027 socket=6
2021-06-05 07:22:17: pcp_child pid 7027: ERROR: failed to process PCP request at the moment
2021-06-05 07:22:17: pcp_child pid 7027: DETAIL: failback is in progress
Why this happens?
When follow primary command is needed to be executed, pgpool main
forks off follow_child process. The process then tries to run
pcp_recovery_node and it sends the request to pcp child
process. Unfortunately the request is denied because failover/failback
is in progress.
static void
pcp_process_command(char tos, char *buf, int buf_len)
{
if (tos == 'O' || tos == 'T')
{
if (Req_info->switching)
{
if (Req_info->request_queue_tail != Req_info->request_queue_head)
{
POOL_REQUEST_KIND reqkind;
reqkind = Req_info->request[(Req_info->request_queue_head + 1) % MAX_REQUEST_QUEUE_SIZE].kind;
if (reqkind == NODE_UP_REQUEST)
ereport(ERROR,
(errmsg("failed to process PCP request at the moment"),
errdetail("failback is in progress")));
In the code fragment, 'O' means online recovery request,
Req_info->switching indicates failover/failback is ongoing. So
pcp_recovery_node cannot be executed while failover/failback is
ongoing. Since pcp_recover_node issues a failback request in the end,
it is not surprising that if there are multiple nodes to be recovered
while executing follow primary command, a pcp_recovery_node run is
canceled by a failback request from other node's pcp_recovery_node.
Recent commit:
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgpool2.git;a=commit;h=455f00dd5f5b7b94bd91aa0b6b40aab21dceabb9
lets follow primary process take the follow primary lock. Also in
failover/failback pgpool main process tries to take the lock in
find_primary_node_repeatedly() but it be would blocked since follow
primary process already acquired the lock.
How to solve this?
The purpose of the follow primary lock is to prevent concurrent run of
follow primary command and detach false primary by the streaming
replication check. We cannot throw it away. However it is not always
necessary to acquire the lock by find_primary_node_repeatedly(). If
it does not try to acquire the lock, failover/failback will not be
blocked and will finish soon, thus Req_info->switching flags will be
promptly turned to false.
When a primary node is detached, failover command is called and new
primary is selected. At this point find_primary_node_repeatedly() is
surely needed to run to find the new primary. However, once follow
primary command starts, the primary will not be changed. So my idea
is, find_primary_node_repeatedly() checks whether follow primary
command is running or not. If it is running, just returns the current
primary. Otherwise acquires the lock.
Attached is the patch to implement this. For this purpose, new shared
memory variable Req_info->follow_primary_ongoing was introduced. The
flag is set/unset by follow primary process.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: online_recovery_fail.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2355 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.pgpool.net/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/attachments/20210606/c23c6029/attachment.bin>
More information about the pgpool-hackers
mailing list