[pgpool-hackers: 3539] Re: Refactoring running mode in Pgpool-II

[Tatsuo Ishii]

>>>  replication_setup_mode seems good, I am also thinking about something like
>>> "backend_clustering_mode" or "backend_clustering_setup"
>>> What do you think?
>> 
>> That's even better I think since not all mode does replication (hint:
>> raw mode). I am going to use 'backend_clustering_mode' and start
>> development of patches.
> 
> While creating patches, I noticed that if we need pgpool.conf.sample
> for master slave mode (pgpool.conf.sample-master-slave) at
> all. Currently it has master_slave_mode = on and master_slave_sub_mode
> = 'slony', and which should be named to pgpool.conf.slony I think.
> 
> Also I noticed that the default pgpool.conf.sample is actually for raw
> mode. Why don't we have new pgpool.conf.sample-raw?
> 
> Also I think the default pgpool.conf.sample should be identical (or
> link to) pgpool.conf.sample-stream, because most of users streaming
> replication cluster.

The patch has been pushed along with documentations.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp>
Subject: [pgpool-committers: 6609] pgpool: Unify master_slave_mode,
	master_slave_sub_mode and replication_
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 11:18:49 +0000
Size: 7553
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/attachments/20200309/4a8dae87/attachment.mht>