[pgpool-general: 8814] Re: queries not redirecting to primary when "delay_threshold_by_time" is exceeded
zam bak
zam6ak at gmail.com
Tue Jun 6 13:07:03 JST 2023
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 9:11 PM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:05 PM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> > I will look into this.
> >> >>
> >> >> It turned out that delay_treshold_by_time is broken since it was introduced.
> >> >> I have fixed it and pushed to the git repository.
> >> >> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgpool2.git;a=commit;h=6aebf24aa9a627f4c852e44f6407f17a34d50528
> >> >>
> >> >> Unfortunately there's no workaround of this for now. Please use
> >> >> delay_treshold instead if you like.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for looking into this.
> >> > This is really impacting us a lot - Is it possible to have a 4.4.4
> >> > release with this fix?
> >>
> >> Yes, 4.4.4 will have the fix.
> >>
> >> > According to the site, next release is slated for August 17th, 2023
> >> > (more than two months away)
> >>
> >> Yes, that's our plan.
> >>
> >
> > What I meant to ask is - Is it possible to have a release sooner than that date?
>
> How do you install pgpool? If you can build pgpool from the source
> code, you could deploy pgpool with the fix today.
>
We use official RPM packages from
https://www.pgpool.net/mediawiki/index.php/Yum_Repository
We have many customer installs of pgpool and, in most cases, packages
are updated as part of the change control process customers have.
I do understand that releasing minor versions more frequently than
once per quarter would put more strain on maintainers though.
Would it be easier to release a patch release for 4.4.3? For example
4.4.3-1 or similar that would include only fixes (no new features)....
If not, I understand and thank you once more for consideration.
Z
> Best reagards,
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS LLC
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
More information about the pgpool-general
mailing list