[pgpool-general: 8422] Re: libpcp.so conflict
Tatsuo Ishii
ishii at sraoss.co.jp
Thu Sep 22 15:50:27 JST 2022
Hi Filip,
Any update on this?
From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp>
Subject: [pgpool-general: 8345] Re: libpcp.so conflict
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:32:29 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <20220719.173229.233073544126494556.t-ishii at sranhm.sra.co.jp>
> Hi Filip,
>
> I think Co-Pilot is a long history project. I wonder why you noticed
> the library name conflict recently. Can you please elaborate?
>
> Best reagards,
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>
>> Ok, thank you for your effort.
>>
>> -Filip-
>>
>>
>> čt 30. 6. 2022 v 7:05 odesílatel Bo Peng <pengbo at sraoss.co.jp> napsal:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > Hi all,
>>> > I maintain pgpool-II in Fedora and I have found that pgpool provides a
>>> > library named libpcp.so. And also another project Performance Co-Pilot
>>> > provides a library with the name libpcp.so. So I would like to ask
>>> whether
>>> > there is a possibility to change this name within Your project? I
>>> > understand that it could be a big change but nonetheless, it could be
>>> > beneficial for pgpool to use some more intuitive name for the library.
>>>
>>> Thank you for pointing out the library conflict issue.
>>>
>>> Our development team will consider your suggestion.
>>> We'll discuss if the library file needs to be renamed
>>> and ask the other packager's opinions.
>>>
>>> Because it's a big change, we need time to make the decision.
>>> I will let you know when we have a conclusion.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bo Peng <pengbo at sraoss.co.jp>
>>> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>>> https://www.sraoss.co.jp/
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> pgpool-general mailing list
> pgpool-general at pgpool.net
> http://www.pgpool.net/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
More information about the pgpool-general
mailing list